You’ve never heard of me, but there’s a good chance that you’ve read some of my work. I’m a hired gun, a doctor of everything, an academic mercenary. My customers are your students. I promise you that. Somebody in your classroom uses a service that you can’t detect, that you can’t defend against, that you may not even know exists.
I work at an online company that generates tens of thousands of dollars a month by creating original essays based on specific instructions provided by cheating students. I’ve worked there full time since 2004. On any day of the academic year, I am working on upward of 20 assignments.
He spends some time talking about why students cheat and which students cheat. I especially like how he points out that a lot of the students who come to him to write their essays for him aren’t necessarily inept; they just can’t write. All the more reason why we should encourage writing in every course. Even you, math teachers, should find a way to get your students to write in class. Want proof that writing is vital in every subject matter? Every subject matter has a textbook.
Even more interesting, he says at one point that the subject most infested with cheaters is education. Isn’t that amazing to think about?
I’ve written papers for students in elementary-education programs, special-education majors, and ESL-training courses. I’ve written lesson plans for aspiring high-school teachers, and I’ve synthesized reports from notes that customers have taken during classroom observations. I’ve written essays for those studying to become school administrators, and I’ve completed theses for those on course to become principals. In the enormous conspiracy that is student cheating, the frontline intelligence community is infiltrated by double agents. (Future educators of America, I know who you are.)
I’m not sure how one can sleep at night knowing they’re cheating their way into a profession in which children and young adults will rely on them not just as educators, but as role models.
Here’s another section that really struck me hard.
After I’ve gathered my sources, I pull out usable quotes, cite them, and distribute them among the sections of the assignment. Over the years, I’ve refined ways of stretching papers. I can write a four-word sentence in 40 words. Just give me one phrase of quotable text, and I’ll produce two pages of ponderous explanation. I can say in 10 pages what most normal people could say in a paragraph.
I’ve also got a mental library of stock academic phrases: “A close consideration of the events which occurred in ____ during the ____ demonstrate that ____ had entered into a phase of widespread cultural, social, and economic change that would define ____ for decades to come.” Fill in the blanks using words provided by the professor in the assignment’s instructions.
Has academic writing really become this formulaic? Is it our fault as educators? Who’s to blame for this?
This article raised some great questions I’ll be thinking about in the coming weeks. What’s even better, however, is that it’s excellently written, so I recommend it to anyone and everyone.
Seconded. A fascinating article on plagiarism and academic integrity.